There is a moment most mothers teaching English at home never plan for, and it changes everything when it arrives. Your child stops answering your questions and starts asking their own.
Until then, every English exchange in the house runs on your fuel. You name things, you ask, you wait, you praise. It works, and it is also exhausting, because the whole language depends on you starting it. The day a child says "What's that?" in English, the direction of the current reverses: your child begins pulling language towards themselves instead of receiving it. That is the point at which a second language starts to sustain itself.
Most families notice something odd on the way there. In Ukrainian the child is already relentless — що це, чому, а де, all day. In English, nothing. Not one question. That gap is not a coincidence and it is not a delay; it has a specific cause, and it is fixable.
Quick answer
Children usually start asking simple questions at 18–24 months and move into why between two and three. In a second language it happens later, and the reason is structural: Ukrainian forms a question mostly with intonation and a question word, while English needs inversion ("Where is it?") or the word do ("Do you want…?") — machinery that has no equivalent to copy. The fastest route is not to teach the grammar but to give your child three or four fixed question chunks they can use whole, and then to stop asking so many questions yourself.
Why a child's own questions matter more than their answers
A child who answers is practising. A child who asks is directing — choosing the topic, requesting exactly the word they are missing, and getting it delivered at the precise moment they want it. There is no more efficient way to acquire vocabulary, and no adult can engineer it, because only the child knows what they are curious about.
Questions also convert you from a teacher into a resource, which is a better job and a far more sustainable one. Instead of inventing prompts all day, you answer. The child does the work of deciding what the lesson is about.
And there is a quieter benefit that matters for families where English is the second language: a child who can ask "What's that?" has a tool for every unknown word for the rest of their life. That single phrase is worth more than fifty nouns, because it is the phrase that fetches the other fifty.
The structural reason English questions come late
This is the part that general parenting articles cannot tell you, because it depends on the language your child already has.
In Ukrainian, a question is mostly built from a question word and intonation, and the word order stays flexible. Де м'яч? and М'яч де? both work. There is no extra machinery.
English does two things Ukrainian does not. It inverts the subject and the verb — "Where is the ball?", not "Where the ball is?" — and for most other questions it inserts a helper verb that carries no meaning at all: "Do you want milk?", "Did you see it?". A child cannot import either from Ukrainian, because neither exists there to import.
| Ukrainian | English requires | What usually comes out |
|---|---|---|
| Де м'яч? — question word plus noun | Inversion: "Where is the ball?" | "Where the ball?" — perfectly normal at three |
| Ти хочеш молока? — intonation only | Helper verb: "Do you want milk?" | "You want milk?" — understood, and still not adult English |
| Що це? | "What's that?" | Usually fine — it is a fixed chunk in both |
| Чому? | "Why?" | Transfers easily; one word, no machinery |
The practical conclusion is unusually cheerful. The two questions that transfer most easily — What's that? and Why? — are also the two most useful ones. You can get a very long way before inversion matters at all, and inversion is not something a three-year-old should be taught. It arrives with exposure, the way it does for children growing up with English as a first language, who also spend a year or two saying "Where the ball?"
The order questions arrive in
Questions are not one skill. They come in a sequence, driven by how concrete the answer is: a child can ask about a visible object long before they can ask about a reason.
| Usually | Question | Why here |
|---|---|---|
| 18m–2y | Rising intonation on a single word: "Milk?" · "Mummy?" | The earliest real question, and it needs no grammar at all. |
| 2–2½ | What's that? · Where's ___? | The answer is a visible object or place. Both are learned as whole chunks. |
| 2½–3 | Who's that? · What's this? · early Why? | People join objects. Why begins as a one-word prod rather than a real request for a reason. |
| 3–4 | Real why, Can I…?, Where is it going? | Causes and permission. The famous why-phase sits here. |
| 4–5 | When, How, questions with do/does/did | Time and process are the last, because both are invisible. |
Two things follow. First, if your two-year-old is not asking why in English, they are not behind — why is a year away in any language. Second, when and how questions are genuinely late, so a four-year-old who asks neither is inside the normal range.
Give whole chunks, not grammar
This is the single most useful idea in the article, and it is the opposite of what feels like teaching.
A three-year-old cannot assemble "Where is the ball?" from parts. But they can store the whole thing as one lump — whereisit — exactly the way they store allgone and thankyou. Chunks require no grammar, they are correct from day one, and the grammar is quietly extracted from them later.
So you do not teach question formation. You supply four phrases, whole, in the moments where they are genuinely needed.
| The chunk | Where to plant it | What it fetches |
|---|---|---|
| "What's that?" | Walks, windows, books, anything new | Every noun your child does not have. The highest-value phrase in the language. |
| "Where's ___?" | Missing shoe, hidden toy, tidying up | Position and objects, and it pairs with the words for in, on and under. |
| "Can I have ___?" | Meals, snacks, anything wanted | Requests. Motivated by genuine desire, so it sticks fastest of all four. |
| "What's this called?" | From about four | The upgrade: a child who asks this can teach themselves vocabulary without you. |
Four phrases. Not a lesson, not a grammar rule, and nothing your child has to build. If chunks are new to you, the underlying principle is the same one in my guide to how single words become phrases.
Ask fewer questions yourself
Here is the counter-intuitive move, and in my experience it is the one that changes things fastest.
Most mothers teaching English at home ask a very high number of questions. What's this? What colour? What does the cow say? Where's your nose? It feels like teaching, and it does have a role — but a conversation made mostly of questions puts the child permanently in the answering seat. Nobody asks a question while they are being tested.
Children ask questions when three conditions are met: they do not know something, they want to know it, and there is a gap in the talking where a question would fit. Continuous adult questioning removes the third condition entirely.
| Instead of asking | Comment, then wait | What often happens |
|---|---|---|
| "What's that? Is it a bird?" | "Ooh… look at that." (then silence) | "What's that?" |
| "What colour is the cup?" | "I like this cup." (pause) | "Why?" or a comment of their own |
| "Where are your shoes?" | "Hmm. I can't find your shoes." (wait) | "Where shoes?" |
| "Do you want water?" | Put the cup slightly out of reach and pause | "Can I have water?" |
The right-hand column is not a trick; it is simply the ordinary shape of a conversation between two people, one of whom is not being examined. There is more on comment-over-question and the other interaction moves in my guide to speaking English with your child every day.
When the question comes in Ukrainian: the bridge
This will be your most frequent situation by a wide margin, and there is a specific move for it that most families never find on their own.
Your child asks «Що це?» during English time. You have three options, and only one of them works.
| What you could do | Effect |
|---|---|
| Answer in Ukrainian | The exchange is fine, but no English is gained. Easy to fall into, and it accumulates. |
| Refuse to answer until they ask in English | Punishes curiosity. The child asks less next time — the exact opposite of the goal. |
| Answer in English, then hand back the English question | The child gets what they wanted and the phrase they will need next time. |
In practice the third option sounds like this. Your child says «Що це?» You say: "That's a crane. 'What's that?' — it's a crane." You have answered first, which honours the question, and then offered the English form once, lightly, without asking them to repeat it.
Do that consistently and the English chunk arrives on its own, usually within a few weeks. Do the second option once or twice and the questions themselves become rarer, which is a far more expensive mistake than any amount of Ukrainian.
The same principle applies when your child answers you in Ukrainian, which is a related situation with its own dynamics — I have written about that separately in my guide to what to do when a child refuses to speak English with you.
Engineer the gap: five situations that produce questions
You can also build the conditions deliberately. Each of these creates a genuine reason to ask — and a question the child actually needs is worth a hundred prompted ones.
- The missing piece. Set out a puzzle or a shoe pair with one part hidden. Say nothing. The absence does the asking for you.
- The sealed jar. Something the child wants inside a container they cannot open. Wait. "Can I have…?" and "Open?" both live here.
- The wrong thing. They ask for a spoon; hand them a sock, entirely straight-faced. Absurdity is one of the most reliable question-generators there is, and it is funny, which matters.
- The mystery bag. An object hidden in a cloth bag that they can feel but not see. "What's that?" is the only available move.
- The unexplained noise. Stop and say "What was that?" then look genuinely puzzled and stay quiet. Curiosity is contagious and this one costs nothing.
None of these takes preparation beyond about ten seconds, and all of them work inside routines you already have. There are more games in this format in my guide to learning English through play.
How you answer decides whether they ask again
The response is where most of the value is created or lost, and the rules are short.
| Do | Do not |
|---|---|
| Answer the question they asked | Turn it back: "What do you think it is?" — occasionally fine, corrosive as a habit |
| Answer immediately and briefly | Deliver a paragraph. Long answers train children to stop asking. |
| Repeat the question correctly inside your answer: "Where's the ball? The ball is under the chair." | Correct the question form: "Say 'where IS the ball'." |
| Answer even the twentieth why, briefly | Say "because I said so" in English — it teaches that asking ends the conversation |
| Say "I don't know — let's find out" | Invent an answer. Children remember them. |
Notice the third row. Your answer already contains the correct form of their question, delivered without comment. That is the entire teaching mechanism, and it is why explicit correction is unnecessary here — a point I make in more detail in my guide to whether to correct your child's English mistakes.
The why-phase, and why it is worth surviving
Somewhere around three, many children begin asking why at a frequency that can genuinely wear a parent down. It is the most complained-about stage in early childhood and one of the most valuable.
Two things are happening at once. The child is discovering that events have causes — a genuine cognitive leap — and they are also discovering that why is a socially perfect conversational tool: it can follow absolutely any sentence and it always produces more talking. Both motives are legitimate.
For a second language, this stage is a gift, because why transfers directly from чому with no machinery. If your child is deep in the why-phase in Ukrainian, that same phase is available in English at the cost of one word.
How to survive it without shutting it down: answer briefly and honestly; when you run out, say "I don't know — what do you think?" and mean it; and when you are genuinely finished, say so plainly ("I'm all out of answers, ask me at dinner") rather than dismissing the question. The one response worth avoiding is the one that teaches a child that asking is an imposition.
What progress looks like, week by week
| Weeks | What you will notice |
|---|---|
| 1–2 | Nothing. You are modelling the chunks and leaving pauses; your child is listening. This is where most families conclude it does not work. |
| 3–4 | The first question, almost always "What's that?", and almost always about something genuinely new. |
| 5–8 | The chunk starts appearing in situations you never modelled it in. That is the signal — it means it has become a tool rather than a phrase. |
| 9–12 | A second chunk joins. Word order is often wrong ("Where the ball?"). Leave it entirely alone. |
The moment worth waiting for is not the first question. It is the first question your child asks about something you were not talking about — because that is the point at which English stopped being an activity you do together and became a language they think in.
One family, five weeks
A mother wrote to me about her daughter, three years and one month. Ukrainian was relentless — questions from the moment she woke. English was around a hundred and fifty words and not one question in eight months of daily rituals.
I asked her to do something that felt wrong to her: record ten minutes of their normal English time and count who asked what. In ten minutes she had asked thirty-one questions. Her daughter had asked none. That was the entire diagnosis — there had never been a gap for a question to occupy.
We changed two things. She cut her questions to roughly ten in ten minutes and replaced the rest with comments and a deliberate pause. And she started using "What's that?" herself, genuinely — about a bird, about a noise upstairs, about something odd in a shop — rather than as a quiz.
Week three, at a window: "What's that?" about a crane on a building site. Week four it appeared twice more, both times about things her mother had not mentioned. Week five it started arriving in the middle of Ukrainian sentences, which sounds like a step backwards and is the opposite — it means the phrase had become a tool the child reached for automatically, regardless of which language was running.
Her English vocabulary had barely moved. What changed was the direction of the conversation.
Seven mistakes that keep a child silent
- Asking questions all day. The commonest by far. A child cannot ask while they are answering.
- Teaching question grammar. Inversion and do are not learnable at three. Give whole chunks.
- Correcting "Where the ball?". Native-speaking children say this for months. Answer, and let your answer carry the correct form.
- Answering at length. Long answers are punishing. Brief answers invite the next question.
- Filling every pause. The question fits in the silence. If there is no silence, there is no question.
- Dismissing the twentieth why. Understandable, and it teaches the exact opposite of what you want.
- Judging progress on grammar. "Where shoes?" is a fully successful question. Count it as one.
A two-week plan
- Days 1–3. Count how many questions you ask in one ordinary hour. Most mothers are surprised. That number is your baseline.
- Days 1–14. Halve it. Replace each removed question with a comment and a pause of three to five seconds.
- Choose one chunk. "What's that?" for most families. Model it yourself — genuinely, about things you are actually curious about — several times a day.
- Once a day. Engineer one gap: the mystery bag, the sealed jar, the wrong object. Ten seconds of setup.
- Answer well. Immediately, briefly, and with the correct form of their question folded into your reply.
- Day 14. Record sixty seconds of a walk or a meal. Count questions in both directions. The ratio is the thing that will have moved.
When it is worth asking someone
I would rather be precise than reassuring, because vague comfort is how genuine difficulties get missed. Seek an assessment — in all of your child's languages — if:
- Your child is over three and asks no questions in any language, including with intonation or gesture.
- They rarely point at things to show you, or bring you objects to look at together.
- They do not respond when you ask simple questions in their strongest language.
- They previously asked questions and have stopped.
- Your own instinct persists. That is a legitimate reason by itself.
What is not on that list: asking freely in Ukrainian but not yet in English. That is a difference in exposure, not a difficulty in the child.
Where the Mommy & Me English method fits
Everything above depends on one thing: enough real conversation, at fixed moments, for chunks to embed and for pauses to exist at all. Not lessons — a shape to the day that repeats.
That is what my course is built to produce. It is a system for the mother: which phrases belong to which everyday moment, in what order to introduce them, how to respond when your child answers in Ukrainian, and how to keep going through the fortnight when nothing appears to be happening. It assumes you are not a native speaker and that your time is limited. You can see how the Mommy & Me English course is built.
My background is a Trinity College London CertTESOL, NILE Young Learners training, and Ukrainian specialist diplomas in speech therapy and primary education, alongside more than nine years teaching children. The speech-therapy half is why this article is built around turn-taking and silence rather than around question drills: those are the two things that decide whether a child ever asks anything at all.
The short version
Your child asking questions in English is worth more than any amount of vocabulary you can hand them, because a question fetches exactly the word they need at the moment they want it.
Give four whole phrases instead of grammar. Halve your own questions and leave the silence where a question can land. Engineer one small gap a day. Answer immediately, briefly, and with the correct form tucked inside your reply. And when "Where the ball?" arrives without the is, treat it as what it is — a complete, successful question — and simply answer it.